Blog

Solar against Biomass

Solar Energy is 100% clean energy. It controls pollution in atmosphere, paving way to cleaner, greener environment. Using Briquette based boilers for heating though renewable, still spoils the atmosphere by CO2 emissions. Most of the industries invest in Solar technologies not as a energy saving or ROI initiative but more from the Social responsibility angle for Clean, Green energy with ZERO emissions and Carbon reduction commitments. Investment on Solar is an added benefit for the brand image. In such a scenario a strict ROI calculation may not be required as long as the project pays for itself – even if it takes longer to pay back the investment. Compared to Solar PV and Solar CSP technologies, Aspiration Energy thermal has the lowest cost per MW and hence is a better Solar investment than other Solar alternatives. Another reason you may want to switch will be due to concerns of continued fuel availability in right quantities at the right time. Here the risk mitigation approach is difficult to quantify in terms of monetary value, even though you may have some numbers associated with loss of production, down time etc. When we replace the system with a Solar system (with hot water storage facility), the boiler itself could be sold and the re-sale price could be adjusted against the solar investment.

Blog

Bhoo’s interview with EAI

Bhoo’s interview with Narsi, EAI on “Aspiring High with Solar Thermal” Source: EAI For those of us glued to the solar radar, most of what we see and hear today are news about solar PV. As if solar thermal simply did not exist. Or matter. And if at all we hear anything on the thermal side, it is about how large scale solar CSP plants under the National Solar Mission are facing tough times. Newspapers and mainstream blogs have a purpose – to report mainstream news. But most emerging (and attractive) business opportunities are not mainstream. Which is why these should be more interesting to entrepreneurs and investors. Solar thermal is one such. Until a few years ago, the equation was simple. Solar thermal = solar water heaters: those nice and reliable tanks on our roofs which gave us water at 65 °C. A nice product, of course, but nothing any entrepreneur would go ga-ga about. Fast forward to 2010, and you suddenly start seeing interesting movements in the solar thermal scene. Let me start from the very beginning. What indeed is solar thermal? Leaving aside CSP (concentrating solar power), which is for power generation, the heat of sunlight when used for heating purposes is solar thermal. As I said before, think solar water heaters. But now, extend your thought. Solar water heaters can give up to 65 °C; all right, stretch it a bit, perhaps 70 degrees. Which is fine for household purposes and select commercial units, but what about industrial units which require water at much higher temperatures? Say, 120 degrees? Your ordinary solar water heater will not be able to help. This is where medium temperature solar thermal kicks in. Let me lay the stuff out for you. Using the Heat of the Sun Type of solar thermal Low temp solar thermal Medium temp solar thermal class I Medium temp solar thermal class 2 High temp solar thermal for power generation Example Solar water heater Enhanced solar heaters Concentrating solar thermal (CST) Concentrating solar power (CSP) Temperatures Upto 70 °C 70-120 °C Upto 250 °C Upto 450 °C You can observe the gradation from the low 70 °C we obtain from solar water heaters up to 450 °C required for generating power from the solar heat. The first two – water heaters and enhanced solar heaters – use fairly simple technologies and materials and hence can be considered fairly low on capex. The last two depend on concentrating sunlight to produce much higher temperatures, and you are suddenly getting into more sophisticated and expensive territory. The Enhanced Solar Heaters thus falls in an interesting intersection – it is fairly simple in terms of technology and operations (similar to solar water heaters), but provides significantly higher temperatures than the water heaters. And the 70-120 °C is an interesting sweet spot for a whole host of industries and commercial units. This is the sweet spot Aspiration Energy is trying to tap into. Bhoovarahan Thirumalai (popularly called Bhoo), is a well-known entrepreneur in the solar thermal field, having been an early mover in medium temperature sector with a solution providing distinct benefits. And with the memorable nickname Bhoo, he has ensured that no one can forget him either. His company, Aspiration Energy, has ploughed along and stayed course in this pioneering area, and today he is a position to show some of his first successes. His innovative PAYS model, that eliminates capex investments for end users, appears close to an inflexion point. Having known Bhoo for almost 5 years now, I felt that there is no better time than this to sit down with him and do a detailed interview. Here we go. I ask Bhoo: So, tell me a bit more on how you got into this. I have known you for a long time, but somehow never got to know some of your history. Bhoo: Well, my partner and I were running the software company Aspire Systems, a successful software venture specializing in software product architecture support. I wanted to do something that is different and ventured out, and solar appealed to me. To begin with, I explored solar PV. Our company did a fair bit of work in developing solar PV systems for mobile telecom towers to offset diesel use. Soon after this, I explored solar thermal and zeroed in on enhanced solar thermal for industrial heating and drying. Me: The sweet spot you are aiming at, the 70-120 °C bracket for industries – what are its characteristics? Somehow, I had thought that it was not a big enough opportunity. Bhoo: Well, that sweet spot is indeed a significant opportunity. A Rs. 50,000 crore business sector of which solar thermal has the potential to have a Rs. 20,000 crore piece of the pie. Now, if Rs. 20,000 crores per year is not a big opportunity, I have to start asking what is. What is not well known is that there are many pre-treatment processes and low hanging heating processes in industries that require only temperatures up to 120 °C. For instance, in the automobile industry there is a pre-treatment process before painting. This is typically a 7-tank wash, of which 5 tanks require moderate heating temperatures. Add the hundreds of automobile units across the country, and many other industries where such pre-treatment or pre-heating is required, and we are looking at a pretty sweet spot for the 70-120 degrees bracket. For a large automobile company alone, such pre-treatment fuel costs could touch upwards of Rs 40 crores a year. There are hundreds of companies for which these costs will range between Rs 2-10 crores per year. Me: Which would these target industries be, that will be glad to have a renewable solution for the 70-120 °C bracket? Bhoo: Some of the sectors that will find medium temperature solar thermal useful are: Consumer durables (including automotive), chemical industries, companies in the dairy and food industries Me: We are talking about replacing fossil fuels such as furnace oil,

Blog

System converts solar efficiently to steam – Scientific American

Credit: Scientific American, Aug 4, 2014 These experiments are great and I see a lot of future for solar heat based innovations meeting a lot of energy needs of the future. How about today? We have always been wondering what is available commercially and what is feasible TODAY. And, that is mid-temperature or low-temperature industrial heat – 70 Deg C to 120 Deg C. A whopping 100 GW+ of potential in the world exists for industrial applications that use these range of temperatures. Instead of just focusing on centralized solar electricity generation – or steam generation – we should somehow make efforts to use the existing commercial technologies for meeting this high demand, that is currently burning fossil fuels. Generally, solar is more suited for decentralized onsite generation of energy. We have been fortunate to get opportunity to install 3 large systems in India – 210 KW, 630 KW and 360 KW each – for industrial heating. We have implemented all these systems on shed-type trussed industrial rooftops. WWF recognizes this as a “Climate Solver” innovation

Blog

Leanoardo DiCaprio is now UN’s climate change ambassador

Excited to hear that one of my favourite actors, Leonardo DiCaprio is now UN’s climate change ambassador.  Any movement that has the potential to change the world, needs lots of attention and Climate change needs more of such star value.  Very happy to see this appointment. It is one thing to be recognized for our work by UNDP and WWF… but when such value is added to the same cause, it is lovely. When I followed this news, I stumbled on the movie made earlier by DiCaprio on climate change – The 11th hour. A preview for those who haven’t watched… I’m reminded of Michael Jackson’s, “Heal the World”. Proud to be a part of an organisation that believes in saving energy, that in turn can make our globe a better place to live in. ~ Bhoo

Blog

Solar Energy Vs Solar Power – 3

Credit: Ron Tandberg My earlier blog post talks about Solar Power and Solar Energy and recommends to add Solar Energy to our vocabulary. But, the revolutionary change that we pride ourselves with – is to specify solar heaters in terms of power KWth instead of in terms of energy – Litres Per Day – LPD.  Oxymoron! LPD – Litres Per Day vs KWth Solar heaters have been traditionally specified as LPD meaning – Litres Per Day.  Why? The traditional solar heaters have been worldwide used in domestic water heaters.  When do we need hot water at home?  Mornings.  Does the sun shine in the mornings?  No.  So, essentially, we are collecting sunlight and solar energy that shone yesterday and using it today.  In that scenario, it is good to express the capacity as LPD – How many useful Litres of hot water can be generated per day. LPD essentially represents the energy collected throughout the day. LPD vs KWth – how to represent the size of solar heaters? But, when it comes to Solar Process Heating systems, we need to work on generating the high temperature required consistently during the day.  That means, we need to have the “power” to heat requisite quantity of water instantly using solar generation. That is why we specify our collectors in terms of KWth! Here are other articles that talks about KWth rating of solar heater collectors. Methodology to present the installed capacity of solar collectors in GWth Simple method for Converting Installed Solar Collector Area to Annual Collector Output ~ Bhoo, CEO, Aspiration Energy

Blog

SolarMax – 2

A follow up article on our earlier post SolarMax principle One example to make a difference between LoadMax and SolarMax amply clear is to take an example of Street Lights. Let’s take a standard model – Sharp Street Light. Lets take the model: SSLL 1018 The basic light there is a 18W light. Load per day:  Let’s say the 18W light runs for 12 hours – Dusk to Dawn 18W x 12 Hours = 216 WHr is what is needed per day. Let us look at what thay have designed it with: Solar capacity:  80 W. 216 WHr / 80 W = Less than 3 hours. So, the solar street light is designed to produce enough energy within 3 hours of sunshine. Sounds great and logical – when you evaluate from a general LoadMax principle.  But, imagine this – more than 300 days a year, sunshine will be for more than 5 hours.  So, Every single day on 300 days a year, 80W x 2 = 160 Whr is wasted.  And, we pay for that generation upfront. Lets take batteries:  12 V, 75 AH.  Not to be a purist in battery design for ease of calculations – I will consider VxAH as a proxy for WHr. 12 V x 75 AH = 900 VAH or approximately 900 WHr. We observed above that the requisite WHr per day is only 216 Whr.  So, this is designed with 4 times the requisite capacity. I am not taking accurate figures.  For an application like solar street light where Hybridization with existing conventional sources of power is difficult, and where the focus is on automated reliable operations, I have no arguments against this design philosophy.  And, battery design is more to do with Depth of Discharge and life-time of batteries. But, I am taking this as an illustration of LoadMax principle. If there were backup conventional sources available – I would build this with a 50W module and 50 Ah battery – which is far more economical.  That will be “SolarMax”. One word of caution though: SolarMax immediately means that it needs to be hybrid – to take care of low generation periods of solar energy.  Wherever hybrids are not possible or feasible or desirable – we need to go back to LoadMax.

Blog

Solar Energy Vs Solar Power – 2

In many public forums, I talk very loudly about Solar Power vs Solar Energy. I am not meaning the technical difference between Power and Energy. I am talking about what the market and general public understand.  The moment we mention “solar” – because of widespread Government side subsidies and awareness programs worldwide, people connect it with “Solar Power”, generally meaning Solar Photovoltaic plants  (PV). But, we use energy in various forms – Light, Heat, motion, cooling, and so on.  The good news is:  Solar Power a.k.a Solar PV based solar electricity generation is a high quality energy – meaning it can be converted to many other energy forms efficiently without losing much of it. Does that mean that we should always go to the high quality of energy (electricity) and then convert it to low quality energy always? Conventional wisdom says, YES.  But, solar changes this. Solar heating – at low temperature is very efficient – at 80-90% efficiency compared to paltry 13-17% of solar PV.  Moreover, costs are 50% if we compare KW capacity to to KW capacity or – KWHr generation cost to KWHr generation cost. What does that mean? We should somehow change the perception and add “Solar Energy” (to mean all forms of energy – heat, light etc) to our vocabulary rather than just “Solar Power” (“to mean electricity”). ~Bhoo, CEO, Aspiration Energy

Blog

Solar Energy vs Solar Power

When I was invited to this conference on Energy-Economy-Environment, I was very happy.  I was even super-happy to see the backdrop – as it had more mention of “Energy” than “Power”. But, the entire first half was devoted to power – and solar and wind power themselves were an “alternative option”, and speaker after speaker spoke about the power situation in Tamil Nadu and grid situation, and so on. I was curious, and started counting words “Power” and “Energy” in the program agenda. . It was: Page 1:  Power    6  ; Energy  3  .  Hands down, “Power” wins! Page 2:  Power   11  ; Energy 2 .  Hands down, “Power” wins! Page 3:  Power    1    ; Energy  11 .  Hands down, FINALLY “Energy” wins!  I was talking in this session, and was very happy! Finally, I mentioned this to the audience and explained how Aspiration Energy is focused on the “other” side of solar – the energy side, rather than just the electrical power side. ~ Bhoo, CEO, Aspiration Energy

Blog

Centralized solar plants, a death trap for birds?

California’s new solar power plant is actually a death ray that’s incinerating birds mid-flight. I am generally not a great fan of centralized solar plants as compared to off-grid and onsite generation. But, I have never thought of such seemingly simple technology causing this kind of trouble to the environment.  Being a death-trap for birds.  Whew! I am sure human ingenuity will solve this issue! ~Bhoo Photo courtesy: Sebastian Anthony

Blog

“Interest in solar water heating spreads globally” – NY times.

Interest in solar water heating spreads globally – says NY times. Solar water heating – particularly for industries is not a ready, mainstream market yet. We and a few of our colleagues are creating the market – by creating awareness and increasing credibility. I am happy to see such articles from New York Times, that recognize the increasing popularity and also the enormous potential that this simple technology holds. I feel once again happy to be in this space – and specifically in the industrial water heating space. I am very happy that our installations are getting worldwide recognition including Climate Solver. I have revised confidence that our pipeline worth 200+ MW will mature in the next few quarters! Renewed confidence on this space! ~Bhoo, CEO, Aspiration Energy

Scroll to Top